Short Stories

A Freethinker at the Reiter Farm, Texas, 1914

 

 

    

A Freethinker at the Reiter Farm

Texas, 1914

 

“Would you tell me again what Helmut wrote you?” Elizabeth Reiter was asking  her husband.

“About his son?” Georg Reiter answered, looking meaningfully at his wife as she stood near the stove in their kitchen.

“Yah, about his son.”

“He said he’s very proud of Otto,” Georg went on, “but he’s also heartbroken. Helmut sent Otto to Germany at a very tender age and there he got an excellent education. He’s a man of science now, an expert chemist, working with fertilizers, chemical fertilizers they are calling them. But also there he started reading other things—learning other things—so that along with his science their boy has turned away from things his parents hold dear. His father says he’s doubting it all—God, the Bible, everything. He’s their only child.”

“I hadn’t understood he’s their only one,” Elizabeth replied in her quiet voice.

“I think he’s been back now for a couple of years,” Georg said. “We’ll ask him some questions, maybe.”

“No, no, better not about that. A professor at College Station? It will be interesting to see what he’s like,” she said to her husband. “Will he bring up his new ideas?”

“I don’t suppose so. It’s fertilizers he wants to talk about—that’s what his father wrote, though he shared his heart on all the rest in his letter. So, soon we’ll find out what our young Professor of Agricultural Engineering is doing. He wants to involve us.”

“I wonder how,” Elizabeth said.

Two minutes later their son—Carl Reiter—called from the front porch, “Someone’s coming up the road—a very big automobile.”

Georg Reiter left the kitchen to join Carl to greet their guest. His wife took a quick detour to the parlor where Carl’s young sister, Ida, was curled up with a book in one of four grand chairs there.

“Company is here, dear child. Come with us to meet him.”

Ida came along and stood next to her parents on the front porch. She was holding her book with her finger marking her place.

Professor Otto Ojemann, wearing a dark suit, immediately was out of his vehicle and standing in front of their farmhouse. He removed his hat for handshakes and introductions as they descended the steps to greet him. Then Elizabeth Reiter ushered everyone inside for lunch. Over the first minutes of the meal they asked the young professor about his work at Texas A & M and about Germany.

“I have been back for two years—my father probably told you some of this when he wrote. I was very much honored to be offered the position at College Station. I can’t tell you how grateful I am to have it—and to be so close to home, too.”

“Your father wrote us about your position,” Georg told him. “He wondered if I might be able to help in some way with experiments you’re doing.”

“I told him if I had the opportunity, I would like to explain my work to you.”

“You must tell us all about it,” Georg said.

But Otto Ojemann pleaded himself not yet ready to talk business. The young professor politely made enquiries about their farm, about other farmers on Longpoint Road, about the schooling of Carl and Ida. As they finished their meal and Elizabeth began to serve coffee and cake, their conversation turned to his purpose in coming.

“Mr. Reiter, my father wrote you that I’m looking for farmers who will help me test our fertilizer. I hoped to ask you to participate. My father said there’s no smarter farmer in Spring Branch than you. The fertilizer works so well, I must tell you, but we want to see how our Texas farmers might get used to using it and what problems or questions might come up in actually applying it. We are interested in a field test, you see.”

“I don’t know that I’m such a smart farmer,” said Georg, folding his hands on the table, “but tell us about your plans.”

“We are continuing the work I began under Professor Fritz Haber at the University of Karlsruhe seven years ago,” the professor began. “This involves processes to do with extracting ammonia from the elements which make it up—nitrogen and hydrogen—in order to produce ammonium sulfate, which is the chief ingredient of our new chemical fertilizer. We have found an economical way to produce it and ship it and we now want to begin to apply the fruit of this process to the cultivation of corn and cotton and perhaps rice.”

And with this, he launched into a lengthy explanation of the chemical needs of plants and the history of fertilizers.

When he concluded he said, “We want to show what our group has developed with three of the most successful farmers among my father’s friends along Longpoint Road. You will see how well it works as you compare it to the rest of your crop and then you may be interested in applying it to more of your plantings and promoting it to the other farmers along Longpoint. My colleagues are interested in talking with you regularly for two years. We want to foster its use very widely in Texas and in other places in the South and we hope to start right here. But you must have questions, so please ask.”

Georg asked questions and Professor Otto Ojemann answered until Georg was satisfied and agreed to join the project. This prompted expressions of gratefulness from the professor until the Reiters were almost embarrassed.

“But I do, truly, thank you from the bottom of my heart!” the young man said feelingly—though he’d already said as much several times.

“Remind us, Professor,” Elizabeth asked, wishing to relieve him of any sense he might have had that would require any further declarations of gratitude, “how long ago was it that you first left Texas to live and study in Europe?”

“Yes, please do tell us,” Georg said, happy to join his wife in turning him to other topics.

“On the very day my parents took me to Galveston to take the ship I turned  seventeen—July 2, 1899.

“That’s my birthday—the second day of July!” Ida interrupted with sudden animation.

“Ah, then!” said Otto. “So we share a birthday! How old are you, Ida?”

“I will be ten. Just three more months,” she answered.

“Then Ida, when you were born I was deep in my studies at the University in Gottingen,” said Otto. “1904, correct?”

“Yes, Herr Professor!” Ida said brightly.

Otto Ojemann laughed deeply.

“I have not been called that before,” he said. “Did you hear that—Herr Professor—from someone?”

“I confess it was me,” Georg said with an embarrassed smile.

“Well, it’s a compliment. And I am grateful, Mr. Reiter—”

“You must now call me Georg,” Ida’s father instructed him. “We need not continue so formally.”

“Georg, then,” the professor said. “I am in your debt, and I am also very honored by this lovely lunch, Mrs. Reiter—”

“Elizabeth, please, Herr Professor,” she gently corrected him.

“Very well, but then no more `Herr Professor,’” he answered. “You must call me Otto.”

“Agreed,” Elizabeth said.

“But back to that July 2,” the young professor began, “I was quite lonely that first day on the ship. And for the first two years—quite lonely. But after that it was not bad at all. Now, it’s the end of February of 1914. So, let’s see….in about four months it will be exactly fifteen years ago that I left for the land of Germany.”

“You were there a long time?”

“I was there thirteen years.”

“So long? But you are content now, Otto, with your work and your life at College Station?” Elizabeth asked.

“Yes, but I will tell you there is one thing: I lack a wife, if I may admit it.”

“Will you have to send to Germany to find a girl as educated as you have become?” Elizabeth said.

“Ah, Texas girls are very nice but yes, you are right after all! To be utterly frank, I almost brought such a woman back with me—we talked of marriage but she was not sure about coming to America—she speaks little English, for one thing, and besides, she is quite shy and perhaps too attached to home, but we still write and I still hope. Her name is Kirsten. She is wonderful. She agrees with me on so many things, my ideas about theology especially so. To live with someone with whom you are in such agreement must be especially desirable! That’s what I would like best of all, if I could have my wish.”

“I hope you may yet have her as your wife,” Elizabeth said sympathetically.

“Thank you,” he said. “Kirsten and I had many conversations about philosophical subjects. My thoughts wander to these grand questions whenever I think of her. She’s a brilliant student of the new thought. They’re fascinating to me, the new ideas coming out of Germany. I’m sure you’d like her. Kirsten is strikingly tall with piercing eyes—a lovely young woman. A Prussian, a great reader and so very intelligent—it was she who first told me about the snowstorm analogy that helped awaken me to things I had never considered before.”

“She sounds like a remarkable young woman,” Elizabeth said.

“And what is this snowstorm analogy?” asked Georg.

“Of course, I’ll tell you!” Otto answered instantly. “So then! In a way, it is the most philosophical of pictures. It’s this: the situation for mankind is like being in a snowstorm—there’s no horizon, total disorientation, the whole world goes white and one becomes lost. Can you imagine what I am describing? We don’t have such storms in southeast Texas, but you must know what I mean. Now, the main problem, apart from the cold and the harshness of the storm itself, is that there’s absolutely no horizon, and to function well a person needs an horizon. You must have that! Think of this: if you are out in the storm and are lost, you simply cannot find your way until the storm is over because there’s no horizon to guide you.”

“Yes, I can see that,” young Carl Reiter now joined in, “because that’s a problem for aviators. In flight you must have an horizon.”

“Exactly, Carl,” said the professor, “or you lose track of the ground and you can crash.”

“I want to be an aviator,” said Carl.

“Ah, an aviator, then? There’s been remarkable progress in aviation—in aeroplane design—in Germany over the past few years. But you see, Carl,” and now he turned to Carl’s parents, “what is true in flight is true in other areas. So, then! The need to know the horizon is also a need we see in theology, as odd as that may seem. There’s a connection between the study of God and the problem aviators face—or anyone else desperately needing an horizon. This is what Kirsten and I often discussed.”

“You had such serious conversations!” Elizabeth said softly.

“Yes, we did. We agreed that man needs an horizon in terms of his physical wellbeing, but he also has psychological needs—or some might call them `spiritual needs’—and horizonlessness is no less a problem in that realm.”

Otto paused to look at Ida and Carl and then back at their parents, seeming to hesitate, but then drawing a deep breath he plunged ahead.

“Man has a constitution such that he needs an horizon, or else he’ll get lost and everything will come to ruin. We’re not talking about snowstorms now, but of our deepest inner world—our minds. Just as he can get lost physically in a snowstorm and perish, man can psychologically perish, too, without an horizon with which to orient his mind. But physically, man only needs the storm to stop and the weather to clear and then there it is!—the horizon—and he again sees very plainly where he is and he is relieved and safe.

“But psychologically or, again, as some may say, spiritually—if I can use such a term as `spiritual’—human beings are also faced with the problem of losing the horizon, as though they were in a snowstorm. In his heart of hearts man lives in a stormy region where horizonlessness is often threatening. Indeed, where it’s always imminent. But men and women have found a way to impose a sort of quiet—a sort of horizon—by creating one, by willing one.  Otherwise, by nature, the natural state of man is to be in a snowstorm that doesn’t stop.”

“These are strange things you are suggesting, Otto,” said Georg Reiter.

“It must seem so, I agree—it seemed so when Kirstin first spoke of this to me—this ‘snowstorm analogy,’ as she called it. Man is always lost until he finds an horizon—that is his natural position, if one were to take him back to his most fundamental state, a `state of nature’ as the English philosophers call it. In that situation, there’s always a blizzard, if you can imagine such a thing.

“It could be a frightening sort of thing to contemplate,” Otto went on, “and very much a crisis for the heart of man. But you see, this is how we may begin to understand where our religious traditions come from! The snowstorm in our heart of hearts is only quelled by man’s effort to will an horizon. What these most advanced of German thinkers have discovered is this: they have seen that we must will it, that is, we must make it—our horizon—and this is the special power of man. So, then! Men have been unable to avoid willing religion so that they may have an horizon!”

Georg had been running his hand through his thick hair, but now he looked at Elizabeth and said, turning back to Otto, “These are troubling things. I am trying to think of the right way to say just how troubling they may be.”

“You are right to feel troubled, Georg,” Otto replied. “But you see, man must will the horizon, and while this isn’t the case in a physical snowstorm, it is the case in man’s mental situation in this world, so that this is precisely what must happen if man is to have the life-saving horizon he absolutely needs to keep himself from being lost. Once we do this, then we can function well in the world. But Georg, Elizabeth, it doesn’t exist—this horizon—apart from man’s willing it to exist. And so this is the origin of religion—it is the work man does in order to create an horizon. Understanding this has changed my entire way of thinking.”

“I don’t understand,” Ida spoke up. She had been trying so hard to follow what Professor Ojemann had been saying.

“Ida, it’s only hard to see because you are still very young,” the professor told her. “You will understand in time. The future belongs to the young. I am telling this chiefly for your parents’ sake, so they can gather what I mean. The youth of the world will grasp this truth more quickly than others and then the world will change. There will be a revolution. Mankind will grow up. But I see, Ida—very clearly—that you are already quite mature for one so young.”

Ida blinked several times—many times—and there was a long pause in the conversation.

“There exists something akin to a perpetual snowstorm underneath all else in the heart of man,” Otto finally continued, “but we’ve made an order that provides for an horizon in the midst of this. This order is so powerful we are persuaded it provides a solid, substantial horizon—but it is only as strong as our power to persuade ourselves of it. Indeed, this is exactly what men have always done—the horizon has been willed for us by our fathers, so to speak. We assume it has always been there. We don’t realize that we’ve made it ourselves—or, rather, inherited it from those who have done so. Do away with this structure, though, and we come face to face with the snowstorm and the horizon vanishes. We assume there really is an horizon, but the only horizon that exists is the one we have willed—or, again rather, our distant ancestors have willed. We assume its permanence and its God-given-ness, but this assumption is not based on reality. Historically speaking, at some distant time long ago, certain wise innovators, understanding that the weakness of the various horizons available, willed stronger, more sustainable ones so that now we speak of these innovators as the great founders of religion—men like Moses and Mohammed and Jesus.

“People who believe these sorts of new realizations are called `Freethinkers’—that’s a term Kirsten and I like a great deal. Freethinkers are people who realize the masterlessness of man. Their thought is free, freed from the traditions which have enslaved the mind of man for so long. It takes courage to break away from old ways of seeing things, for to do so flies in the face of our strong traditions. But this is a freedom we are meant for—this freedom from all past stories and myths about man. This is the only one—the only story that is the truly true story.

“So, then! We see that man is alone in a vast universe, but there’s great freedom in seeing this. It takes courage to seize upon this truth. But once we do, the future opens up, for then we see the challenge ahead of us, and the responsibility: we must will man’s future. Man, with the help of the great tool of science, is forging ahead, bravely pioneering a new world.”

Professor Ojemann, almost out of breath, paused and suddenly seemed to be surprised at himself, as though he’d forgotten himself and gotten carried away.

“Perhaps I have said too much. I am sorry—I hope I have not offended,” he said. “I become so enthralled by the glory of it all, I forget myself and can’t help myself.”

Georg took a great breath. He had known for several minutes that he needed to make some kind of reply.

“Otto,” Georg said, seeming to struggle to find the words, “if what you say is true, that men must `will’ some story, then just who will do that? Which people should we trust with such a task? What desires will guide them? Couldn’t these people just as easily come up with something terrible instead of something good? We must beware of the pride of man and the darkness of the human heart. But this is not even the biggest problem, as serious as it is, that I sense has to do with what you have been saying. No, something else comes first. I am trying to say this politely to you, but I must tell you, I do not think you are right about there being no horizon at all—or however you wish to put it. No, Otto, I think this whole story you have been telling us is mistaken.”

 

 

 

 

“But how so?” asked Otto.

“Because just as there’s an horizon when a snowstorm finally stops in the world,” Georg replied, “so—though there may be storms in our minds—there is an horizon there, too, which times of peace and quiet allow us to see. We know there is one—an horizon in our minds, too—because God gives us peace when we trust in His Word. So, Otto, because God reigns over the mind of the man who is at peace with Him, there finally is an horizon and a clear and blue sky. So yes, storms come in our minds, but He is able to bring clear weather and end storms in His good time. I know the one true God remains above and He gives meaning to life and direction for us, so that if we are willing to pay attention to Him, we are never, ever lost and lacking an horizon. We do not will meaning in life—no God gives it. It’s from outside of ourselves.”

“A heartfelt reply,” answered the professor immediately, “and one I have often heard. Oh, I acknowledge that traditional beliefs must assert themselves in self-defense, as you have done. But what I’ve said can be exhilarating and hopeful, too, Georg, once you embrace the fact that every story mankind has told to explain things ends up being a tale—just a tale—a tale he tells himself. I would never doubt your sincerity—but I tell you this is the very gist of the new philosophical realization: every idea that speaks of something being there is the result of man’s willing it—every single one. Man tells himself a tale so that he may live well. But without that, naturally speaking, there’s nothing there.”

But now Otto suddenly hesitated again, as though he feared he’d said too much. And yet, as though he thought he must still try to make it plain, went ahead yet again.

“We are utterly dependent on human imagination if we are to give some meaning to human existence. But this is not a truth to make us despair! No! Our new truth will simply be the dignity of man!”

He now grew almost rapt and, practically crying out said, “Dear Georg—dear Mr. Reiter—man at last will be as he was meant to be. Man must perfect himself for the glory of his own dignity, and, as I said before, it is science which will be his chief aid!”

“What are you saying?” Elizabeth Reiter suddenly broke in, crying out, a look of horror on her face and with an uncharacteristic harshness in her voice.

“I only wished to show that—
“—Otto, man is incapable of such a thing—of any such thing at all! This is a way that leads to, to—to disaster. I tell you, my young professor, that man, left to himself, will soon choose something wrong, something wicked! Man has long ago shown how often he has thrown his dignity in the dust! To speak of the glory of the dignity of man? Man is in need of rescue because too often dignity means nothing to him! It’s pride and power and arrogance that mark him more often than not. Thank God we have a good Master in Christ, who loves us and saves us from ourselves! You say nothing of him. What of him?”

“Ah, Elizabeth, God is nothing more than the effect of the will of man,” Otto replied, suddenly growing mild. “Man is on his own—he must define himself. Arrogance? No. It is only necessity. Yes, it’s necessary for man to strive to deny his nothingness, and that is precisely what he does—but now, at last, let it be done without myths and stories that make us subject to bondage! Man must be free of every yoke! Not arrogance, but the yearning to be free of every yoke—this is what characterizes man at his best.”

Elizabeth Reiter was silent. All was quiet now. Ida had never seen her mother or her father engaged in such talk with anyone. Her brother Carl, too, blinking and with a startled expression, looked at his parents and at their guest, each in turn.

“You speak of yokes, Otto, and of freedom from bondage,” said Georg, looking first at Professor Ojemann, then at his wife and children, and then turning again to regard their guest. “These are shining and glittering terms, but terrible things are being forgotten in all these words. Terrible things! It would be bondage, indeed, to leave man to invent himself with his selfish and rebellious heart. The heart of the problem is the deceitful heart of man. It’s sin—sin is the problem. What is sin? It’s just one way of saying man is a rebel against his Maker. No, Otto, what new forms of slavery man would create for himself if he embraces such a view of the world! What you are saying is no solution to the problems of life—to depend on the mistaken idea of the goodness of man!”

“But Georg,” Otto replied, “there is no other way because there is no one else. Man’s hour, man’s time, has come. Man isn’t fallen at all as the traditional view insisted—no, he is ever ascending, and now for the first time he finds himself free from such heavy burdens as religion has placed on him and so will be the more able to stand. Yes, he is a rebel—a rebel against falsehood and illusions. Now the full ascent of man will begin!”

“It won’t happen,” Georg said softly, almost with pity. “Man, as Elizabeth was saying, will make even a greater mess of things if this is to be his work. But I must tell you it’s not necessary at all for human beings to create a new story because the true old story we learn from the Bible hasn’t failed and that story is not dependent in the least upon man! But besides that—since you speak of horizons as invented by man—there is a real horizon in the very nature created by God. Man makes nothing at all, finally. God makes the horizon, for speaking of these, we see divine purposes in nature all around us. There is a real horizon, even nature tells us.”

“Ah, Georg, you defend your story as you did before, and I know there are many who agree with you. But scholars in Europe will begin to filter out from the universities there and come here to America, too. They have weighed the authority for the old view—and found it wanting. This is the finest fruit of what is known as the European Enlightenment, of human reason set free from superstition. It might be helpful for you to know of the chief exponent of these ideas—because I’m not telling you my theory. Several years ago in Gottingen, in the heart of Saxony, I began to read with such joy the persuasive works of the great Friedrich Nietzsche. From this man, Friedrich Nietzsche, I have learned that we invent not only religion but all meaning. We are determined to do only one thing—to deny that we are nothing! This is a great revelation and the truth that this man, Nietzsche, found! This is much-talked-about all over Europe. Many are beginning to share such views without even realizing their source in a great thinker who represents the glory of Germany. He is the first and most profound of those who talk this way. We are at the dawn of a new age. We know these truths will lead to a great new freedom of the human spirit.”

Ida, closemouthed, her eyes wide and alert, and her older brother, both listened and watched. Ida’s father, his hands on his knees, sitting back from the table in his chair, looked at his wife.

“So, where do you say man comes from?” Georg asked with great seriousness.

“Many say they don’t know. They say he just found himself here, but many now say the answer is obvious—the Englishman Darwin showed us so that it is obvious! He evolved.”

“From what, Otto?”

“From a long series of accidents involving matter alone—there’s nothing beyond that. All that is is matter and motion.”

“And so where does man come from?” asked Georg.

“A kind of effect of the evolutionary process. An accident of a very long and natural course of events.”

“Man is an accident?”

“Yes, that’s right.”

“But Otto, your believing it doesn’t make it so. Your expression is one of faith.”

“Georg, if you wish to speak of origins,” Otto declared, “you are left with a Bible story—Adam and Eve—which no serious scholar of these matters today can any longer believe.”

“Ah, Otto, is this belief that man came from God and that God created Adam and Eve, so much harder to accept than your belief that man, in all his wondrous complexity and imaginative ability, is an accident? And there’s the matter of life in the first place. Where did that come from—the life that started off in what you say was an accidental matter? Life is so rich and complex. How can it be an accident?”

“Time—lots of time—and chance. And so the inorganic somehow, by some spark that was an accident, became alive. Ah, Georg, it’s far easier to believe man is an accident than to believe the stories of Adam and Eve. No, some primeval storm, some enormous electrical charge eons ago, when every ingredient was just right—

temperature, gravity, electricity, the presence of the right forms of matter—some electrical burst, some mechanically explainable galvanizing power brought animation to a single cell, and that was life, and from that came all the rest. I suppose it happened in some sense like that. All that then was needed was lots of time—eons and eons. It was an accident—a marvelous one, no doubt, but still an accident. No Providence was there. Another great German, Friedrich Lange, in 1865, in his History of Materialism, made this perfectly plain. Lange and Darwin and Nietzsche—liberators of the human race from myth! It’s far easier to believe that than the Bible!”

“No, Otto, it’s not easier,” said Georg Reiter, “but it is more convenient, because if man is not an accident you then are faced with a God to whom we all must answer. That, dear Otto, is very inconvenient for the rebellious heart of man which wants to be allowed to do as it pleases and answer to no one. No, Otto, it’s not easier to believe man is an accident. But man is a lost rebel and your doctrine is just the newest expression of that and it’s further proof that man needs a savior.”

“I don’t mean to be obstinate, Georg,” Otto replied, “but it’s not just me. It’s the character of the future and it’s coming and its watchword is this: Only man can save man.”

Elizabeth leaned confidentially toward her guest and said, “To follow these things”—she said this with much conviction, “is to go into that very nothingness you say man will now deny by his own cleverness!”

As Elizabeth Reiter was saying so, Otto began to sit further back in his chair—had he been standing he would have taken a step backward—for Elizabeth, leaning toward him, spoke with such quiet confidence and fire in her tone that the young professor felt himself being almost physically pushed by a strange mixture of defiance and compassion.

Now he began to realize he had deeply offended her.

“I do understand you,” said Otto, clearing his throat.

Then with a slight bow of the head and a half smile of embarrassment he said, “And I fear, again, that I’ve said too much. I have forgotten myself. I didn’t want to disturb you—not in any way. Please forgive me. I see I have offended. I don’t know what came over me. I usually don’t speak about these things except in the company of those who already hold them dear, and yet we found ourselves speaking of them against all my better judgment. It has been some time since I did—the pressure to declare them had built up. But now that I have spoken of them, I apologize. I forget how new my ideas will seem to some. I forget that others have their own ideas which are dear to them, too. I did not mean to have offended and I am afraid I have. I understand your honorable defense of your beliefs. I’m sorry. But let’s not argue any more.”

“No, we won’t argue,” Georg replied. “We have said enough, I think.”

“You have honorably defended the old religion,” said Otto Ojemann.

Ida stole a glance at the professor. For several minutes she had been afraid to look at him, so intensely had the conversation proceeded right in front of her.

“How patient you both have been with me, considering how I fear I have offended,” the professor continued.

“Otto, let’s not speak any more about it,” said Georg, “and don’t worry about my willingness to be part of your work. I will gladly join your fertilizer experiment.”

“You are doing this for my father’s sake, but I am grateful—and after I have been so impolite.”

“We do this for you, Otto—we wish you well in your work,” said Georg.

He drank another cup of coffee and ate another piece of Elizabeth’s dessert, and then after a few more minutes the Reiter family escorted Professor Ojemann to his  Chevrolet touring car. Once he’d started the engine he allowed Carl to sit behind the wheel for two minutes as he explained some of the automobile’s features to him. Then with many thanks and final words of farewell, he drove away.

When Professor Otto Ojemann had gone, Georg Reiter and his wife asked

Carl and Ida to come into the formal parlor. Seated in the four large, stuffed chairs there, they asked their son and daughter what they thought of the conversation they’d just had over lunch. A time of questions and answers ensued and then Carl and Ida were excused.

“I am afraid for them,” Elizabeth said when they were alone.

“We don’t want them to be unprepared, Elizabeth,” Georg replied. “They will have to fight doubts of all kinds. If they never have any practice, how will they do in the days ahead? It’s important that they be forearmed.”

“They’re without defenses—we have rarely heard such things ourselves. And today was a strong assault, wasn’t it?” Elizabeth worried.

“They heard our replies. May such things build them up and make them strong,” Georg replied. “We will pray.”

“And trust our Lord,” Elizabeth said.

“Yes, Elizabeth.”

One morning in late August, six months later, Ida read the Houston Chronicle aloud to her father, mother, brother and Mr. Kolb, their hired man—as she did often on Saturdays when the men came in from their early work for a big breakfast. This was a practice Ida loved and which had been going on for nearly a year, for she was a very precocious reader. Georg delighted in having Ida read aloud. He often pointed to a headline and said, “Ida, would you read us that one?”

On this August Saturday they began with the calamities overwhelming Europe, for the war had begun. After they’d finished breakfast and Ida had read several articles, Carl and Mr. Kolb went out to the barn but Georg lingered with his daughter and his wife at the table. He pointed to a headline prominently displayed on one of the inside pages, “Gulf Coast Society of Freethinkers Established at Rice Institute.”

“Ida, let’s see what that’s about,” he said. He remembered Professor Ojemann using the term “Freethinkers” during his visit in February.

Ida began to read. They learned that the founders of the Gulf Coast Society of Freethinkers were all university professors—a Professor McGaugrin at Rice Institute in Houston, one Professor Paul Klein at LSU in Baton Rouge, and with excitement she read, “Professor Otto Ojemann of Texas A & M!”

The meeting had taken place in Houston and had included a debate as the inaugural event, a debate, the paper reported, which had included some heated argument about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.

“A professor of history from Rice Institute,” Ida read aloud, “attending the meeting, got to his feet and shouted that the works of Friedrich Nietzsche were `unwholesome and destructive of the character of any true gentleman,’ and that `no doubt the Kaiser’s soldiers going off to war right now are carrying Nietzsche’s books in their rucksacks.’”

The article went on in a more placid vein to describe something of the genesis of the Society. Ida reminded her parents that she remembered the professor telling them about the famous man with that same name—and now here he was again.

“You remember his name, Ida! So you remember, too, what `Freethinkers’ are, then?” Georg Reiter asked his daughter after she’d finished the article.

“People like Professor Ojemann?”

“Yes,” her father nodded, “but Ida, when I look at the trees, when I see the corn coming up, when I look at the sun in the sky during the day and the stars in the sky during the night, when I see our cows calve and when I look at you and Carl, and at your dear mother, and at myself, too—I can’t help but know there is an explanation for the beauty and orderliness of the world, in spite of all that’s wrong with it. These all cry to me of the truth that God made us. No, Ida, these Freethinkers are in the grip of a very great falsehood.”

“Yes, Papa, and yet he knows so much—he is a professor! He came here to visit us, a famous man! Why, he’s even in the newspaper.”

“Ida, is this proof that he’s right?”

“No, but Papa, still, that corn you planted with his fertilizer—it’s so much taller than the corn you left without the fertilizer.”

“True. Professor Ojemann is learning the secrets of nature. It’s all the more a wonder to me, then, that he is unable to see that it’s God behind it all. But God gives wisdom and gifts of knowledge to whomever He pleases, even to men who do not believe in Him.”

“But Mama, Papa, does he really believe that God is the invention of man?” Ida asked.

“It seems he does, Ida,” her mother replied. “Remember, dear, very smart men can still be mistaken.”

Georg Reiter was quiet then for a long moment.

“The greatest miracle is that we are able to see God’s hand in the world—for we are not naturally wiser than Professor Ojemann. It’s only God’s goodness that enables us to see, so we must be patient and loving toward those who do not yet see. God, in His wisdom, shows wonderful things to those who are not wise in the ways of this world, and He hides His truth from those who are judged very wise by this world. But we are not better than others. What we know is only by the mercy of the good Lord.”

“God is good, Papa, isn’t He?” asked Ida, who put her hands on her father’s arm and then leaned her head down on it as well—resting it there as they sat at the breakfast table.

“Yah, dear Idaleine,” he said, stroking her head, “of that I am convinced. He is good. But there is this war in Europe. It’s because men turn from God that they resort to such wars, and the only way back to peace is through the Gospel way that God has given us. When Jesus comes again, only then the swords will be turned into plows and the spears into pruning hooks, just as the Bible says.”

And with that he embraced Ida, kissed his wife, took his hat and went out the door, calling to Carl and Mr. Kolb, who had been waiting, talking to one another in the shade by the barn. His wife and daughter saw him placing a hand briefly on a shoulder of each as they walked out into the fields again to continue their morning’s work in the August sun. It was already getting quite hot on this bright, blue-sky Texas summer morning.